Stuff that makes you go mhhh...
thando_SA
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit thando_SA's Xanga Site!

Name: thando
Metro:
Gender: Female


Interests: General: economics, politics and metaphysics


Message: message me


Member Since: 4/3/2006

SubscriptionsSites I Read
jsolberg
LsThinkinOutLoud
Barrys_Binder
thenarrator
DEISENBERG
splork_splork
Peregrine_Pilgrim
thembisile
power_responsibility
suejeanne
buddha_gazelle
Komaldip
shola

Blogrings
The Naked Public Square
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Tuesday, October 06, 2009

What are we working for?

The Revolving Door
Insanity every floor
Skyscraping, paper chasing
What are we working for?
Empty traditions
Reaching social positions

- Lauryn Hill

In an essay published in 1930 under the title "Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren", John Maynard Keynes (who often wrote for the New Statesman) looked forward to an age when humanity would be so well-off it could retire.

Keynes imagined that about a hundred years on - or, to us, fairly soon - barring a great war or a population explosion, capital returns and technical advances would raise Europe and the United States to such a standard of living that men and women would devote their energies "to non-economic purposes". The age-old struggle for subsistence would be resolved and economic history would come to an end.

In the 2020s, Keynes wrote, the pursuit of wealth for its own sake "will be recognised for what it is, a somewhat disgusting morbidity, one of those semi-criminal, semi-pathological propensities which one hands over with a shudder to the specialists in mental disease".

From our vantage, eight decades later, it looks as if Keynes was wrong. Despite the wholesale destruction of capital in the Second World War, and an unprecedented rise in population, western standards of living measured in Keynes's terms ("houses, transport, and the like") have improved out of all recognition. Yet the pursuit of wealth for its own sake, far from being viewed as a disgusting morbidity, has never been more widespread or celebrated. Science and compound interest have not brought history to an end. The satisfaction of needs has not brought contentment, let alone what Keynes and his Bloomsbury friends valued above all: a life of leisure and moral and intellectual improvement.

At the heart of Keynes's mistake is a problem that has troubled philosophers since Aristotle, and that is luxury, or consumption beyond need. Adam Smith, the greatest British philosopher, believed that in a free and secure society bodily and even social needs could be satisfied. But desires, in his beautiful phrase, "seem to be altogether endless". People can and will wish for the world. Smith, who sought to clear the scholastic cobwebs from the study of wealth and to disenchant and unmoralise what we now call the economy, was obliged to accord a starring role to the imagination.

The dividing line between wish and need was never clear. Smith observed that shoes were a necessity to poor Scotsmen, but a luxury to Scotswomen, who went barefoot. In modern society, where most people live in cities, and where both needs and wishes are absolved through the same remote agency - money - the distinction between wishes and needs has altogether vanished. Listen to the conversations around you: "I will die if I do not have that dress"; "I have to go to hospital"; "You really must see the new Pinter."

Where the distinction has dissolved, there can be no contentment. We work hard and long to accumulate indiscriminate property. Above all, we accumulate money. For while real or personal property is good for a particular purpose - a house to live in, a car to get from place to place, a coat to wear - money is good for all those things and everything else the imagination can contrive.

Yet however much money we accumulate, the fellow from the hedge fund will have more. Where consumption is both conspicuous and competitive, humanity will never run out of new wishes. All the while, industry creates new desires that are marketed, in the great fashion paradox, as both novelty and need. You would have thought that humanity had been for centuries in want of an iPhone, which has now - not before time, thank you! - been invented. As Voltaire recognised, luxury is need: Le superflu, chose très nécessaire.

James Buchan, 2007


Thursday, October 01, 2009

The dawn of the solar age?

The fossil age and all that it represents – the oil industry and oil/fossil finances and product manufacturing, including heating systems, lighting, travel, and (especially) war – are coming to a close and it’s happening faster than we can even comprehend. In fact, it’s happening more rapidly than we can absorb financially, which is why our global economy is shattered. The financial structures of our global society cannot adapt fast enough to the speed at which the “solar” changes are now underway.

The solar age with its rise in energy technology, the Internet, energy communications, energy medicine, energy or on-line business, education, Facebook, news, blogs – the world of instantaneous contact – will ultimately eclipse all fossil systems. In this massive Axial shift, from one template of power to another, more than just “fossil-based” jobs, such as drilling for oil, will be lost. The fossil-based economics of nations will have to be undone and rebuilt around solar economics, literally and symbolically.

Consider, just as something to ponder, that fossil fuel is limited in location and in quantity but solar power is abundant and free, which is to say, no one can claim ownership to the sun – well, Halliburton will no doubt try, but suffice it to say, no one has yet to pull that one off. That alone is symbolic of “one earth”, one global community; that is the template of holism, a template that you have been actively pursuing as an individual for years, if only through how you have approached your own health. This shift that is now unfolding faster than any one can comprehend should not really feel like a surprise, but as something you were expecting, and even more so, as something for which you have been preparing for years.

Caroline Myss

----

Links shared on other blogs: US health care debate  <To judge the content of a nation's character, look no further than its health-care system>; Why Democrats Are Losing on Health Care

 


Saturday, September 19, 2009

African elite: Parasites not creators

This is an excerpt from my review of the book, "Architects of Poverty" by Moeletsi Mbeki. For a concise introduction to the book's core theme, check out this interview.

~~~~

Do you know why people like me are shy about being capitalists? Well, it’s because we, for as long as we have known [you], were capital…

                                                                                Jamaica Kincaid, A Small Place

 

Capitalism means different things to different people. The basic definition of the term is that of an economic system based on private property and private ownership of the means of production (i.e. land, labour, capital and technology). Karl Marx saw it as an essential historical stage in the development towards a communist society. For communism couldn’t come to being without the production of vast amounts of material goods necessary to abolish Adam Smith’s division of labour. To everyday people of the so called Third World the mere mention of the word evokes a sour history of brutal exploitation.

 

To Moeletsi Mbeki capitalism simply denotes human progress. The production and accumulation of more and more consumer goods and services is what will ultimately lead to improvements in the social conditions of humanity (greater security and comfort is how Mbeki puts it). To quote:  

The capitalist economy is…inherently driven to produce more and more so that its denizens may increase their security and comfort…. Africans are, of course, no different from other human beings in desiring security and comfort. (p12-13)

Mbeki explains that the rise of Western-style capitalism is a unilinear process wherein one phase of economic development inevitably leads to the next- from mercantile capitalism to industrial capitalism to what is now termed global capitalism. He writes:

Mercantile capitalism is the earliest form of capitalism and its principle is buying cheap and selling dear. Capitalism in the West has moved a long way from the days of mercantile capitalism; it went through the stage of industrialization and Western countries are now referred to as post-industrial societies.  (Preface xi)

Thus “Architects of Poverty” is about the how the failure of African political leaders to advance “African capitalism” from mercantilism to industrialisation, keeps the poor African people in what he dubs “the bottom billion”. Written in a journalistic style- in the sense that it reads like it has been cobbled together from variously selected articles, books and research notes- the book makes for an easy narrative. His attempt, however, to explain the complex issues of poverty in Africa in terms of only one of a multitude of contributory factors only lends itself to, as I will demonstrate in the paragraphs that follow, a conveniently selective reading of history.

In this review I will take a look at how the usage of the nebulous term “African elite” rather than providing insights into how Africa’s elite have under-developed the continent, “Architects” subtextually such sets in motion a new class war between the new capitalists, the entrepreneurs who are the creators of wealth and the venal old capitalists, a nationalist elite who live off inherited but declining wealth. 

AFRICAN ELITE

That elite is most successful which can claim the heartiest allegiance of the fickle crowd; can present itself as most "in touch" with popular concerns; can anticipate the tides and pulses of opinion; can, in short, be the least apparently "elitist."

                                                            Christopher Hitchens, No One Left to Lie To

 

The dictionary definition of the word “elite” is: the richest, most powerful, best educated or most skilled group in a society. In dictionary terms Moeletsi Mbeki's profile completely fits the definition: Chief Executive Officer of a resource and logistic company, African Resources & Logistics Corporation (Arelco); a political analyst for Nedcor Bank; director of “several companies” (the back cover of “Architects” states), which include Endemol South Africa, a television production company; was a Nieman Fellow at Harvard University; deputy chairman of the South African Institute for International Affairs, an independent think tank based at the University of the Witwatersrand; son of the late liberation struggle hero,  Govan Mbeki; brother to a former South African President and grandson of the first black landowners in the Transkei.

 

By singling out politicians as the “African elite”, Mbeki is essentially engaging in an internecine class warfare (elite vs. elite) which seeks to demonise African political leaders, regardless of whether they would be democratically elected or dictators, as the “architects of poverty”, whilst entrepreneurs and multi-national corporations are extolled as champions of the poor. It’s a war over who should dominate the economic policy space. In this regard, “Architects of Poverty” stops short of calling for power to be transferred from governments to businesses. Why Mbeki, instead of calling on people to press for accountability of these political leaders he looks up to authoritarian rule -  change the mindset of existing political elitesor replace them with leaders who are more oriented toward development-  to bring about a “new democracy”, is very telling.

 

So, who are the “African/black elite” according to Mbeki?

 

At once it they to liberators:

In the 1960s…when political elites were relatively small and were still close to the masses who had supported them in their (notice how he captures the liberation movement as belonging to the political elites and not to the people) struggles against colonialism, they made a great deal of effort not only to grow their countries’ economies but also to distribute the benefits of growth to their peoples through investment in social and physical infrastructure. (p3-4)

Then after his skimpy accounts of the assassination of Congo’s Patrice Lumumba (more on this below) and the overthrow of Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah on page 5 they morph into a Western educated class: 

African nationalism was a movement of the small, Westernised black elite… (a) group of educated intermediaries…that emerged under colonialism. Its fight was always for inclusion in the colonial system so that it, too, could benefit from the spoils of colonialism. (p6-7)

A page thereafter, gatekeepers of Western interests:

What has gone wrong has been the massive mismanagement by Africa’s ruling political elites, with the help of Western powers, of the economic surplus generated in Africa in the past 40 years. As heirs to the colonial state, political elites exploited their strong position in relation to the private sector…to transfer vast amounts of economic surpluses generated by agriculture and extractive industries such as oil, diamonds, metal and timber to developed countries as capital flight, while simultaneously obtaining vast loans from developed countries. (p8-9)

Then finally they degenerate into a patrimonial, power-addicted and self-interested lot:

African elites today sustain and reproduce themselves by perpetuating the neo-colonial state and its attendant socio-economic systems of exploitation, devised by colonialists. (p16)

By railing against the privilege of African nationalist and protesting against their venality, Mbeki is attempting to hijack the ideological space that the sons and daughters of toil have long been occupying in order that he appears least elitist.  The motive: to meld business executives, if only theoretically, with the masses.

I found it rather curious that Mbeki cares to mention that the overthrow of Ghana’s first Nkrumah got:  “a little help from the United States government”. Yet conveniently chooses to provide zero detail surrounding the assassination of Lumumba (Congo's first post-colonial and who until 2006 was the last democratically elected Prime Minister); except for a glib comment in the Notes section that he was executed in circumstances that “remain murky”. Quite odd he would say that given that there is a book out there that gives a thoroughly vivid and detailed account of how and why Belgium, the USA, Britain and the French conspired and masterminded the death of Lumumba to make way for decades of obscene plunder which left one of Africa's mineral rich countries practically bankrupt. The book, published in 2001, is by Belgian Historian Ludo De Witte and titled, “The Assassination of Lumumba”.

The book’s initial publication in Dutch prompted the Belgian government to set up an official inquiry into Lumumba’s death. The two-year inquiry that ended in 2001 found that the assassination could not have been carried out without the complicity of Belgian officers backed by the C.I.A. and concluded that Belgium had a moral responsibility for the killing. In 2002 Belgium officially apologized to the Congolese people for its “irrefutable” complicity in the 1961 assassination of Patrice Lumumba.

I have brought up historical realities not to absolve African politicians of their responsibility for poverty in Africa, but to bring to bear the fact that the so called “African crisis” has both internal and in the main external dimensions.  Throughout the 60 years of the current age of development we have been lulled into believing the deficit view of poverty in Africa. Our poverty is caused by our greedy, incompetent and corrupt political leaders. True, Africa has had and still has some corrupt and power-addicted political leaders.  But leaders, be they revolutionaries, democrats or tyrants do not emerge from a vacuum. There are people, particular historical and socio-economic conditions which together give rise to different kinds of leaders. A closer look into these factors is perhaps what is needed for clues about why contemporary Africa keeps churning out parasitic leaders.


Sunday, July 12, 2009

US President Obama's Ghana Speech

Good morning. It is an honor for me to be in Accra, and to speak to the representatives of the people of Ghana. I am deeply grateful for the welcome that I've received, as are Michelle, Malia, and Sasha Obama. Ghana's history is rich, the ties between our two countries are strong, and I am proud that this is my first visit to sub-Saharan Africa as President of the United States.

I am speaking to you at the end of a long trip. I began in Russia, for a Summit between two great powers. I traveled to Italy, for a meeting of the world's leading economies. And I have come here, to Ghana, for a simple reason: the 21st century will be shaped by what happens not just in Rome or Moscow or Washington, but by what happens in Accra as well.

This is the simple truth of a time when the boundaries between people are overwhelmed by our connections. Your prosperity can expand America's. Your health and security can contribute to the world's. And the strength of your democracy can help advance human rights for people everywhere.

AFRICA'S IMPORTANCE

So I do not see the countries and peoples of Africa as a world apart; I see Africa as a fundamental part of our interconnected world - as partners with America on behalf of the future that we want for all our children. That partnership must be grounded in mutual responsibility, and that is what I want to speak with you about today.

We must start from the simple premise that Africa's future is up to Africans.

I say this knowing full well the tragic past that has sometimes haunted this part of the world. I have the blood of Africa within me, and my family's own story encompasses both the tragedies and triumphs of the larger African story.

My grandfather was a cook for the British in Kenya, and though he was a respected elder in his village, his employers called him "boy" for much of his life. He was on the periphery of Kenya's liberation struggles, but he was still imprisoned briefly during repressive times. In his life, colonialism wasn't simply the creation of unnatural borders or unfair terms of trade - it was something experienced personally, day after day, year after year.

My father grew up herding goats in a tiny village, an impossible distance away from the American universities where he would come to get an education. He came of age at an extraordinary moment of promise for Africa. The struggles of his own father's generation were giving birth to new nations, beginning right here in Ghana. Africans were educating and asserting themselves in new ways. History was on the move.

But despite the progress that has been made - and there has been considerable progress in parts of Africa - we also know that much of that promise has yet to be fulfilled. Countries like Kenya, which had a per capita economy larger than South Korea's when I was born, have been badly outpaced. Disease and conflict have ravaged parts of the African continent. In many places, the hope of my father's generation gave way to cynicism, even despair.

COLONIALISM AND LIBERATION

It is easy to point fingers, and to pin the blame for these problems on others. Yes, a colonial map that made little sense bred conflict, and the West has often approached Africa as a patron, rather than a partner. But the West is not responsible for the destruction of the Zimbabwean economy over the last decade, or wars in which children are enlisted as combatants. In my father's life, it was partly tribalism and patronage in an independent Kenya that for a long stretch derailed his career, and we know that this kind of corruption is a daily fact of life for far too many.

Of course, we also know that is not the whole story. Here in Ghana, you show us a face of Africa that is too often overlooked by a world that sees only tragedy or the need for charity. The people of Ghana have worked hard to put democracy on a firmer footing, with peaceful transfers of power even in the wake of closely contested elections. And with improved governance and an emerging civil society, Ghana's economy has shown impressive rates of growth.

This progress may lack the drama of the 20th century's liberation struggles, but make no mistake: it will ultimately be more significant. For just as it is important to emerge from the control of another nation, it is even more important to build one's own.

So I believe that this moment is just as promising for Ghana - and for Africa - as the moment when my father came of age and new nations were being born. This is a new moment of promise. Only this time, we have learned that it will not be giants like Nkrumah and Kenyatta who will determine Africa's future. Instead, it will be you - the men and women in Ghana's Parliament, and the people you represent. Above all, it will be the young people - brimming with talent and energy and hope - who can claim the future that so many in my father's generation never found.

GOVERNANCE AND PARTNERSHIP

To realize that promise, we must first recognize a fundamental truth that you have given life to in Ghana: development depends upon good governance. That is the ingredient which has been missing in far too many places, for far too long. That is the change that can unlock Africa's potential. And that is a responsibility that can only be met by Africans.

As for America and the West, our commitment must be measured by more than just the dollars we spend. I have pledged substantial increases in our foreign assistance, which is in Africa's interest and America's. But the true sign of success is not whether we are a source of aid that helps people scrape by - it is whether we are partners in building the capacity for transformational change.

This mutual responsibility must be the foundation of our partnership. And today, I will focus on four areas that are critical to the future of Africa and the entire developing world: democracy; opportunity; health; and the peaceful resolution of conflict.

DEMOCRACY

First, we must support strong and sustainable democratic governments.

As I said in Cairo, each nation gives life to democracy in its own way, and in line with its own traditions. But history offers a clear verdict: governments that respect the will of their own people are more prosperous, more stable, and more successful than governments that do not.

This is about more than holding elections - it's also about what happens between them. Repression takes many forms, and too many nations are plagued by problems that condemn their people to poverty. No country is going to create wealth if its leaders exploit the economy to enrich themselves, or police can be bought off by drug traffickers. No business wants to invest in a place where the government skims 20 percent off the top, or the head of the Port Authority is corrupt. No person wants to live in a society where the rule of law gives way to the rule of brutality and bribery. That is not democracy, that is tyranny, and now is the time for it to end.

In the 21st century, capable, reliable and transparent institutions are the key to success - strong parliaments and honest police forces; independent judges and journalists; a vibrant private sector and civil society. Those are the things that give life to democracy, because that is what matters in peoples' lives.

Time and again, Ghanaians have chosen Constitutional rule over autocracy, and shown a democratic spirit that allows the energy of your people to break through. We see that in leaders who accept defeat graciously, and victors who resist calls to wield power against the opposition. We see that spirit in courageous journalists like Anas Aremeyaw Anas, who risked his life to report the truth. We see it in police like Patience Quaye, who helped prosecute the first human trafficker in Ghana. We see it in the young people who are speaking up against patronage, and participating in the political process.

Across Africa, we have seen countless examples of people taking control of their destiny, and making change from the bottom up. We saw it in Kenya, where civil society and business came together to help stop post-election violence. We saw it in South Africa, where over three quarters of the country voted in the recent election - the fourth since the end of Apartheid. We saw it in Zimbabwe, where the Election Support Network braved brutal repression to stand up for the principle that a person's vote is their sacred right.

Make no mistake: history is on the side of these brave Africans, and not with those who use coups or change Constitutions to stay in power. Africa doesn't need strongmen, it needs strong institutions.

America will not seek to impose any system of government on any other nation - the essential truth of democracy is that each nation determines its own destiny. What we will do is increase assistance for responsible individuals and institutions, with a focus on supporting good governance - on parliaments, which check abuses of power and ensure that opposition voices are heard; on the rule of law, which ensures the equal administration of justice; on civic participation, so that young people get involved; and on concrete solutions to corruption like forensic accounting, automating services, strengthening hotlines, and protecting whistle-blowers to advance transparency and accountability.

As we provide this support, I have directed my Administration to give greater attention to corruption in our Human Rights report. People everywhere should have the right to start a business or get an education without paying a bribe. We have a responsibility to support those who act responsibly and to isolate those who don't, and that is exactly what America will do.

OPPORTUNITY

This leads directly to our second area of partnership - supporting development that provides opportunity for more people.

With better governance, I have no doubt that Africa holds the promise of a broader base for prosperity. The continent is rich in natural resources. And from cell phone entrepreneurs to small farmers, Africans have shown the capacity and commitment to create their own opportunities. But old habits must also be broken. Dependence on commodities - or on a single export - concentrates wealth in the hands of the few, and leaves people too vulnerable to downturns.

In Ghana, for instance, oil brings great opportunities, and you have been responsible in preparing for new revenue. But as so many Ghanaians know, oil cannot simply become the new cocoa. From South Korea to Singapore, history shows that countries thrive when they invest in their people and infrastructure; when they promote multiple export industries, develop a skilled workforce, and create space for small and medium-sized businesses that create jobs.

As Africans reach for this promise, America will be more responsible in extending our hand. By cutting costs that go to Western consultants and administration, we will put more resources in the hands of those who need it, while training people to do more for themselves. That is why our $3.5 billion food security initiative is focused on new methods and technologies for farmers - not simply sending American producers or goods to Africa. Aid is not an end in itself. The purpose of foreign assistance must be creating the conditions where it is no longer needed.

America can also do more to promote trade and investment. Wealthy nations must open our doors to goods and services from Africa in a meaningful way. And where there is good governance, we can broaden prosperity through public-private partnerships that invest in better roads and electricity; capacity-building that trains people to grow a business; and financial services that reach poor and rural areas. This is also in our own interest - for if people are lifted out of poverty and wealth is created in Africa, new markets will open for our own goods.

One area that holds out both undeniable peril and extraordinary promise is energy. Africa gives off less greenhouse gas than any other part of the world, but it is the most threatened by climate change. A warming planet will spread disease, shrink water resources, and deplete crops, creating conditions that produce more famine and conflict. All of us - particularly the developed world - have a responsibility to slow these trends - through mitigation, and by changing the way that we use energy. But we can also work with Africans to turn this crisis into opportunity.

Together, we can partner on behalf of our planet and prosperity, and help countries increase access to power while skipping the dirtier phase of development. Across Africa, there is bountiful wind and solar power; geothermal energy and bio-fuels. From the Rift Valley to the North African deserts; from the Western coast to South Africa's crops -Africa's boundless natural gifts can generate its own power, while exporting profitable, clean energy abroad.

These steps are about more than growth numbers on a balance sheet. They're about whether a young person with an education can get a job that supports a family; a farmer can transfer their goods to the market; or an entrepreneur with a good idea can start a business. It's about the dignity of work. It's about the opportunity that must exist for Africans in the 21st century.

HEALTH

Just as governance is vital to opportunity, it is also critical to the third area that I will talk about - strengthening public health.

In recent years, enormous progress has been made in parts of Africa. Far more people are living productively with HIV/AIDS, and getting the drugs they need. But too many still die from diseases that shouldn't kill them. When children are being killed because of a mosquito bite, and mothers are dying in childbirth, then we know that more progress must be made.

Yet because of incentives - often provided by donor nations - many African doctors and nurses understandably go overseas, or work for programs that focus on a single disease. This creates gaps in primary care and basic prevention. Meanwhile, individual Africans also have to make responsible choices that prevent the spread of disease, while promoting public health in their communities and countries.

Across Africa, we see examples of people tackling these problems. In Nigeria, an Interfaith effort of Christians and Muslims has set an example of cooperation to confront malaria. Here in Ghana and across Africa, we see innovative ideas for filling gaps in care - for instance, through E-Health initiatives that allow doctors in big cities to support those in small towns.

America will support these efforts through a comprehensive, global health strategy. Because in the 21st century, we are called to act by our conscience and our common interest. When a child dies of a preventable illness in Accra, that diminishes us everywhere. And when disease goes unchecked in any corner of the world, we know that it can spread across oceans and continents.

That is why my Administration has committed $63 billion to meet these challenges. Building on the strong efforts of President Bush, we will carry forward the fight against HIV/AIDS. We will pursue the goal of ending deaths from malaria and tuberculosis, and eradicating polio. We will fight neglected tropical disease. And we won't confront illnesses in isolation - we will invest in public health systems that promote wellness, and focus on the health of mothers and children.

PEACEFUL RESOLUTION OF CONFLICT

As we partner on behalf of a healthier future, we must also stop the destruction that comes not from illness, but from human beings - and so the final area that I will address is conflict.

Now let me be clear: Africa is not the crude caricature of a continent at war. But for far too many Africans, conflict is a part of life, as constant as the sun. There are wars over land and wars over resources. And it is still far too easy for those without conscience to manipulate whole communities into fighting among faiths and tribes.

These conflicts are a millstone around Africa's neck. We all have many identities - of tribe and ethnicity; of religion and nationality. But defining oneself in opposition to someone who belongs to a different tribe, or who worships a different prophet, has no place in the 21st century. Africa's diversity should be a source of strength, not a cause for division. We are all God's children. We all share common aspirations - to live in peace and security; to access education and opportunity; to love our families, our communities, and our faith. That is our common humanity.

That is why we must stand up to inhumanity in our midst. It is never justifiable to target innocents in the name of ideology. It is the death sentence of a society to force children to kill in wars. It is the ultimate mark of criminality and cowardice to condemn women to relentless and systematic rape. We must bear witness to the value of every child in Darfur and the dignity of every woman in Congo. No faith or culture should condone the outrages against them. All of us must strive for the peace and security necessary for progress.

Africans are standing up for this future. Here, too, Ghana is helping to point the way forward. Ghanaians should take pride in your contributions to peacekeeping from Congo to Liberia to Lebanon, and in your efforts to resist the scourge of the drug trade. We welcome the steps that are being taken by organizations like the African Union and ECOWAS to better resolve conflicts, keep the peace, and support those in need. And we encourage the vision of a strong, regional security architecture that can bring effective, transnational force to bear when needed.

America has a responsibility to advance this vision, not just with words, but with support that strengthens African capacity. When there is genocide in Darfur or terrorists in Somalia, these are not simply African problems - they are global security challenges, and they demand a global response. That is why we stand ready to partner through diplomacy, technical assistance, and logistical support, and will stand behind efforts to hold war criminals accountable. And let me be clear: our Africa Command is focused not on establishing a foothold in the continent, but on confronting these common challenges to advance the security of America, Africa and the world.

In Moscow, I spoke of the need for an international system where the universal rights of human beings are respected, and violations of those rights are opposed. That must include a commitment to support those who resolve conflicts peacefully, to sanction and stop those who don't, and to help those who have suffered. But ultimately, it will be vibrant democracies like Botswana and Ghana which roll back the causes of conflict, and advance the frontiers of peace and prosperity.

As I said earlier, Africa's future is up to Africans.

The people of Africa are ready to claim that future. In my country, African-Americans - including so many recent immigrants - have thrived in every sector of society. We have done so despite a difficult past, and we have drawn strength from our African heritage. With strong institutions and a strong will, I know that Africans can live their dreams in Nairobi and Lagos; in Kigali and Kinshasa; in Harare and right here in Accra.

Fifty-two years ago, the eyes of the world were on Ghana. And a young preacher named Martin Luther King traveled here, to Accra, to watch the Union Jack come down and the Ghanaian flag go up. This was before the march on Washington or the success of the civil rights movement in my country. Dr. King was asked how he felt while watching the birth of a nation. And he said: "It renews my conviction in the ultimate triumph of justice."

Now, that triumph must be won once more, and it must be won by you. And I am particularly speaking to the young people. In places like Ghana, you make up over half of the population. Here is what you must know: the world will be what you make of it.

'YES YOU CAN' AND RESPONSIBILITY

You have the power to hold your leaders accountable, and to build institutions that serve the people. You can serve in your communities, and harness your energy and education to create new wealth and build new connections to the world. You can conquer disease, end conflicts, and make change from the bottom up. You can do that. Yes you can. Because in this moment, history is on the move.

But these things can only be done if you take responsibility for your future. It won't be easy. It will take time and effort. There will be suffering and setbacks. But I can promise you this: America will be with you. As a partner. As a friend. Opportunity won't come from any other place, though - it must come from the decisions that you make, the things that you do, and the hope that you hold in your hearts.

Freedom is your inheritance. Now, it is your responsibility to build upon freedom's foundation. And if you do, we will look back years from now to places like Accra and say that this was the time when the promise was realized - this was the moment when prosperity was forged; pain was overcome; and a new era of progress began. This can be the time when we witness the triumph of justice once more. Thank you


Sunday, June 28, 2009

When someone sees the same people every day as had happened with him at the seminary, they wind up becoming a part of that person's life. And then they want the person to change. If someone isn't what others want them to be, the others become angry. Everyone seems to have a clear idea of how other people should lead their lives but none about his or her own.

Paulo Coelho, The Alchemist



Next 5 >>